Blog

A Retrospective Look at Women’s Body Hair in Pop Culture

Via Loren Savini at Allure:

It’s personal, it’s political, and it can get prickly. For centuries, we’ve teetered on what to do with the hair that covers our bodies. We’ve gone from ripping it off with tacky goops (fun fact: the Ancient Egyptians used to use waxes like beeswax) and hacking it off with any sharp edge we can get our hands on, to wearing it proudly on red carpets and on social media in order to make a statement. We’ve even gone as far as to faking it with merkins (Google the term and be amazed). In the past decade, the great body hair debate has shifted, as the sight of it becomes more and more mundane. Regardless of whether we like our skin smooth or with a little scruff, body hair has proven to be a force in history. Below is a look at the complicated story behind the hair below our heads.

Read the rest

Brandi Glanville blames laser hair removal for facial paralysis

Another laser hair removal injury. Via Page Six:

Glanville‘s face paralyzed, the reality star claimed in a video posted Tuesday on “Bicoastal Beauty Unfiltered.”

“Everyone wants to know why my top lip doesn’t move. Right here, you see a little white circle,” the former “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” star explained in the 12-minute clip. “I had laser hair removal on my upper lip about 2009. Maybe 8? I got a third-degree burn, and my face on the right side doesn’t move the way my face on the left side moves.”

Read the rest

Federal Trade Commission settles complaint against Tactica International

The Federal Trade Commission today announced a settlement with Tactica International, Inc. (Tactica), under which the New York City-based company will pay a $300,000 civil penalty for allegedly failing to live up to its shipment promises for a wide range of products, including the Epil-Stop hair-removal system. According to the FTC, Tactica violated the Commission’s Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule (Mail Order Rule) by failing to ship products to consumers when promised, or in 30 days when no time was promised, and failing to give consumers the option of consenting to the delays or cancelling their orders.

The FTC also contends that the company had no reasonable basis for its delivery promises, or within 30 days if no specific delivery date was promised. The FTC’s complaint and consent decree were filed today by the U.S. Department of Justice at the Commission’s request.

“The Mail Order Rule is perfectly clear,” said Howard Beales, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “When companies know they can’t live up to their delivery promises, or can’t deliver within 30 days of receiving an order, they’re required to notify the buyer and offer an opportunity to okay the delay or cancel the order. Companies have to live up to their end of the bargain for consumers to maintain their confidence in the mail-order system.”

The Commission’s Complaint

The complaint and consent decree announced today were filed against Tactica International, Inc. d/b/a IGIA and IGIA.com. According to the Commission, Tactica advertises health and personal grooming products by catalog, in the print media, on television through infomercials, and in retail stores. Some of its products included the Ion-Aire hair dryer, Epil-Stop hair removal products, Therma-Spa paraffin bath, and the Igia Terrycloth robe. Typically the advertising for these products either contained no shipment representations or represented that a consumer should allow “three-to-four weeks for delivery.” Under the Rule, the merchant must have a reasonable basis for any express or implied shipment representation or, if no shipment representation is made, a reasonable basis for shipment within 30 days of receiving a consumer’s order.

The FTC’s complaint alleges that when Tactica promised consumers that it would ship in time for delivery within three to four weeks, it often failed to have a reasonable basis for that promise. Other times, when Tactica made no shipment representations, the company allegedly had no reasonable basis for completing shipment within 30 days. Having learned that it could not ship in the promised time or 30 days, the company allegedly failed to notify consumers of the delay and offer them the right to cancel and obtain a prompt refund, as required by the Rule.

In addition, according to the complaint, when Tactica did attempt to notify consumers of shipment delays, it violated the Mail Order Rule by failing to provide them a definite revised shipment date and by failing to offer them the option to cancel and obtain a prompt refund.

Terms of the Consent Decree

Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, which requires court approval, Tactica is prohibited from violating the Mail Order Rule in the future, specifically with regard to the conduct alleged in the Commission’s complaint. In addition, for five years, Tactica and any successor entities must keep records demonstrating their full compliance with the terms of the order. They also must provide copies of the order and the FTC’s Business Guide to the Mail or Telephone Order Rule to their supervisory or managerial employees, and must subsequently certify their compliance with these terms to the Commission. Tactica also is subject to stringent reporting requirements. Finally, it will pay a civil penalty of $300,000, due within 30 days of the entry of the consent decree.

The Commission vote to refer the complaint and proposed consent decree to the DOJ for filing was 5-0. The complaint and consent decree were filed on behalf of the FTC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 21, 2004.

NOTE: The proposed consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. Consent decrees have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint, or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at http://www.ftc.gov .

The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies worldwide.

(FTC File No. 012-3192; Civ. No. 04 CV 3038)

CONTACT INFORMATION

Media Contact:Mitchell J. Katz
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2161Staff Contact:Joel N. Brewer
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2967

 

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2004/04/consumers-pull-hair-out-over-late-deliveries-seller-depilatory

Major site update underway

News about the major site update to improve functionality.

In the first site-wide update since the site went live 10 years ago, we are adding a lot of new functionality to hairfacts.com. Thanks for your patience as we iron our the bugs. If you find a dead link, please email me at andrea@hairfacts.com or comment in this post or on our hair removal forum. We look forward to bringing you many new features and ways to share hair removal information soon!

New book: Unwanted Hair and Hirsutism

Alison Amoroso has just published a new book on hair removal. She was kind enough to mention this site and some other writing I have done on the topic.

Laser injury lawyer starts own firm

New York lawyer Susan Karten has helped several hairfacts readers who have been injured during hair removal procedures.

She has just started her own firm and is handling laser cases and similar injuries.

Susan M. Karten & Associates, LLP
355 Lexington Avenue
Suite 1400
New York, New York 10017

The un-doctor’s office: Practice aims to soothe

By Annie Reed of the Westmont Progress profiles a local practitioner of cosmetogynecology, where gynecologists’ offices have become centers for cosmetic procedures including hair removal

Herbert worked as an OB/GYN at Midwest Physician’s Group in Orland Park for 13 years. In addition to her new practice in Westmont, she is an assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine in Downers Grove.
Office location: 700 Pasquinelli Drive, Suite B, Westmont
PHONE (630) 920-2600

Full article

http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/westmont/homepage/x185288786

Bodygroom Manalogues with Brian Callen

Matt at MediaBistro points out a fun campaign for male hair removal:

http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/tribal_ddb/manicuring_the_wood_with_brian_callen_95485.asp

Bodygroom Manalogues (sponsored by Philips)

http://www.manalogues.philips.com/

Update:

Some people report an error:

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

Can’t wait till people start using standardized video compression. PS: Flash sucks.

Threading in Birkdale (UK)

Amy Salter of the Southport Visiterprofiles a local threading practitioner:

Carole Todd, who works from her home on Waterloo Road, trained in the Indian practise of threading, after struggling to find anywhere in the North West that did it.

Full article

http://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/southport-news/southport-southport-news/2009/01/23/birkdale-beauty-therapist-has-threading-hair-removal-treatment-all-sewn-up-101022-22754294/